topchetoeu/j2s
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 6 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 74 Wiki Activity

Maybe use a Value class instead of Object? #16

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-04-05 11:27:07 +00:00 by TopchetoEU · 1 comment
TopchetoEU commented 2024-04-05 11:27:07 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Currently, the engine uses the builting Object type to represent values. However, this is a very dirty and fragile solution. Maybe ponder the idea of going back to a Value class?

Currently, the engine uses the builting Object type to represent values. However, this is a very dirty and fragile solution. Maybe ponder the idea of going back to a Value class?
TopchetoEU commented 2024-09-04 07:07:58 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

pondered. switched. never looked back

pondered. switched. never looked back
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature or request

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
question

Further information is requested

  
wontfix

This will not be worked on

No Label
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: topchetoeu/j2s#16
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?