From db64b2b1edbb07055d450df168c360fedb5598a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Pall <mike>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:28:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] FFI: Clarify ffi.cdef behavior.

---
 doc/ext_ffi_semantics.html | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/ext_ffi_semantics.html b/doc/ext_ffi_semantics.html
index 03229012..57839b16 100644
--- a/doc/ext_ffi_semantics.html
+++ b/doc/ext_ffi_semantics.html
@@ -1188,7 +1188,9 @@ storing and initializing them are supported, yet.</li>
 <li>The <tt>volatile</tt> type qualifier is currently ignored by
 compiled code.</li>
 <li><a href="ext_ffi_api.html#ffi_cdef"><tt>ffi.cdef</tt></a> silently
-ignores all re-declarations.</li>
+ignores most re-declarations. Note: avoid re-declarations which do not
+conform to C99. The implementation will eventually be changed to
+perform strict checks.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>
 The JIT compiler already handles a large subset of all FFI operations.